Your information is worthless in economic circles because you compare apples to oranges and your data does not normalize damage cost to account for wealth and demographics like a truly accurate economic analysis would. In reality, using valid economic methodology, the cost of extreme weather has trending downward as a RATIO of GDP which is great news. Why would you want to mislead people with bad news that is based on flawed methodology when there are several peer reviewed economic studies indicating that extreme weather costs are trending lower? Please explain.